ArticleInternational ophthalmology2025
Timing of the modified yamane technique in complicated cataract surgery: same session or second session?
Article in International ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional and anatomical outcomes of Yamane technique-based scleral fixation after complicated cataract surgery versus IOL extraction.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Intraocular lens post-scleral suture fixation: an ultrasound biomicroscopy study.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to evaluate the timing of the modified Yamane technique (MYT) in complicated cataract surgery where capsular support is lost.
methodsThis retrospective study was conducted on 41 eyes of 41 patients. Participants who underwent the MYT during primary cataract surgery were classified as group P(n = 12),while those who underwent the technique in a second session after cataract surgery were classified as group S(n = 29).Preoperative and postoperative ophthalmological findings were examined in both groups.
resultsIn group S,the mean time between the two surgeries was 18 days (range:6-32 days).Preoperative intraocular pressure was 12.5 ± 2.9 mmHg in group P and 15.1 ± 1.9 mmHg in group S(p = 0.02).At the postoperative six-month follow-up, no significant differences were observed between the two groups in relation to visual acuity, refraction measurements, or intraocular pressure values(p > 0.05 for all). Central macular thickness was measured as 274 ± 18 microns(range:236-291 microns) in group P and 254 ± 11 microns (range:229-272 microns) in group S(p = 0.02).In the early postoperative period (< 1 month),cystoid macular edema occurred in two cases(16.6%) in group P, while one case(8.3%) of increased intraocular pressure and one case(8.3%) of severe corneal edema were observed. In group S, cystoid macular edema occurred in one case(3.4%).No complications were detected in either group during the late postoperative period.
conclusionIn cases of complicated cataract with loss of capsular support,the MYT,whether performed in the same session or in a second session, yielded comparable visual and refractive outcomes. While complications were more frequent in the early postoperative period in the group undergoing surgery in the same session,no complications were observed in either group during the late postoperative period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40387987What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.