Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40387955›Full record

ArticleDiscover oncology2025

XGBoost model for predicting erectile dysfunction risk after radical prostatectomy: development and validation using machine learning.

Hesong Jiang, Lu Ji, Leilei Zhu, Hengbing Wang, Fei Mao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hesong JiangDepartment of Urology, The Affiliated Huaian No. 1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Huaian City, 223300, Jiangsu Province, China.
Lu JiDepartment of Urology, The Affiliated Huaian No. 1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Huaian City, 223300, Jiangsu Province, China.
Leilei ZhuDepartment of Urology, The Affiliated Wuxi People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi People's Hospital, Wuxi Medical Center, Nanjing Medical University, #299 Qingyang Road, Wuxi, 214023, Jiangsu Province, China.
Hengbing WangDepartment of Urology, The Affiliated Huaian No. 1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Huaian City, 223300, Jiangsu Province, China. wanghengbing2004@163.com.
Fei MaoDepartment of Urology, The Affiliated Huaian No. 1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Huaian City, 223300, Jiangsu Province, China. maofeidoctor@njmu.edu.cn.

Funding

Development Fund of Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University No. XYFY202312Huai'an Science and Technology Plan Project No. HAB2024013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundErectile dysfunction (ED) is a frequent complication following radical prostatectomy, significantly affecting patients' quality of life. Traditional predictive methods often struggle to capture complex nonlinear risk factors. This study aims to develop a machine learning-based model to improve ED risk stratification and guide personalized management.

methodsA total of 1,147 prostate cancer patients were analyzed, among whom 285 (24.85%) developed postoperative ED. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified age, smoking history, Gleason score, prostate volume, T-stage, surgical approach, operative time, intraoperative bleeding, and PCT levels as independent risk factors (P < 0.05). Machine learning models, including XGBoost, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and k-Nearest Neighbors, were trained for ED risk prediction. Key predictors included advanced age, smoking history, Gleason score ≥ 8, prostate volume ≥ 40 ml, T-stage, laparoscopic-assisted surgery, and prolonged operative duration.

resultsXGBoost exhibited the highest predictive accuracy (AUC: 0.980 in training; 0.960 in validation), outperforming other models. Calibration curves confirmed strong concordance between predicted and actual probabilities, while decision curve analysis demonstrated superior clinical utility, with XGBoost providing the greatest net benefit. Ten-fold cross-validation indicated stable performance (validation AUC: 0.9127 ± 0.0770; test AUC: 0.9592; accuracy: 0.9111), and external validation confirmed model generalizability (AUC: 0.84). SHAP analysis highlighted key risk contributors, enabling individualized risk assessment and targeted clinical interventions.

conclusionThe XGBoost model exhibited superior predictive performance and clinical applicability in assessing ED risk after radical prostatectomy, offering a robust tool for personalized postoperative management.

Indexed as

Erectile dysfunction (ED)Machine learningRadical prostatectomyRisk predictionXGBoost model

Identifiers

PMID40387955
PMCPMC12089576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.