ArticleMicrobial ecology2025
Bacteria in Honeybee Crops Are Decoupled from Those in Floral Nectar and Bee Mouths.
Article in Microbial ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- The Honey Bee Body Surface as a Microbial Hub: Connectivity Shaped by Monoculture vs. Polyculture Farming.Insects · 2026Article
- Do Shifts in Honeybee Crop Microbiota Enable Ethanol Accumulation? A Comparative Analysis of Caged and Foraging Bees.Microbial ecology · 2025Article
- Tiny but mighty? Overview of a decade of research on nectar bacteria.The New phytologist · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bacteria in the honeybee gut are a well-recognized factor affecting bee health. However, the primary focus of this research has been the hindgut, while the crop, or honey stomach, is assumed to be dominated by environmentally acquired transient taxa that matter little to the bees. To evaluate this assumption, we examined bacterial taxa in the crop and mouth of Apis mellifera and A. cerana japonica foragers and in the nectar of Prunus mume flowers visited by the bees in the Minabe-Tanabe region of Japan. We found that in bacterial composition, the crop was distinct from both the mouth and the nectar, whereas mouth and nectar samples were indistinguishable. Furthermore, the crop remained similar in bacterial composition and diversity, while the mouth showed a sharp drop in alpha diversity and a large increase in beta diversity, from summer to winter. These results refute the conventional assumption, suggesting instead that the crop contains a conserved bacterial community largely distinct from environmental taxa. We also found that strains of a crop-associated species, Apilactobacillus kunkeei, could be season- and host species-specific. Together, these findings suggest that crop-associated bacterial communities should be studied further to better understand the relationship between honeybees and their gut bacteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.