ArticleAnimal cognition2025
Visual numerical cognition in pigeons: conformity to the Weber-Fechner law.
Article in Animal cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Categorical Representation of Numerosity in the Pigeon Entopallium: Coding Format and Temporal Dynamics.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Numerical competence in peafowl: small quantity discrimination.Animal cognition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As representatives of a basal bird lineage, pigeons have exhibited remarkable visual numerical cognition, comparable even to that of monkeys. Nevertheless, whether visual numerical cognition in pigeons conforms to the Weber-Fechner law remains unknown. To address this, we designed a fully automated apparatus tailored for pigeons and used it to train them to perform a delayed match-to-numerosity task. The results showed that on a linear scale, pigeons represented smaller numerosities with higher precision and larger numerosities with lower precision, exhibiting a numerical magnitude effect. When the linear scale was compressed into a logarithmic scale, this magnitude effect was offset, resulting in similar representational characteristics across different numerosities. This finding suggests that the mental number line of pigeons is logarithmic rather than linear, consistent with the Weber-Fechner law. While biological brains seek precision in representing numerical information, they must also take computational load into account. This representational strategy may be the optimal outcome of the trade-off between computational precision and computational load that biological brains have achieved through long-term evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.