Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40387891›Full record

Observational studyClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2025

Validation of complex PCI criteria in drug-coated balloon angioplasty.

Francesco Tartaglia, Mauro Gitto, Pier Pasquale Leone, Mauro Chiarito, Gianmaria Calamita, Gianluca Mincione, Gabriele Gasparini, Bernhard Reimers, Ottavia F Cozzi, Marco L Rossi and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational StudyValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Francesco TartagliaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Mauro GittoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Pier Pasquale LeoneDivision of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
Mauro ChiaritoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Gianmaria CalamitaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Gianluca MincioneDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Gabriele GaspariniDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Bernhard ReimersDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Ottavia F CozziDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Marco L RossiEMO-GVM Centro Cuore Columbus, Milan, Italy.
Giulio G StefaniniDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Damiano RegazzoliDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Antonio MangieriDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Antonio ColomboDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy. colombo.emogvm@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProcedural complexity during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES) has been associated with adverse events, especially in case of long and multiple stents implantation.

objectiveThis study aims to validate contemporary complex PCI criteria for drug coated balloon (DCB)-based PCI.

methodsConsecutive patients undergoing DCB angioplasty at 2 Italian centers from 2018 to 2023 were retrospectively enrolled. Complex DCB-PCI was defined as the presence of at least 1 of the 6 following features: 3 vessels treated; ≥ 3 lesions treated; ≥ 3 devices (DES or DCB) used; bifurcation treated with 2 devices; total device length (DES + DCB) > 60 mm; CTO as target lesion. The primary endpoint was the 2 year incidence of target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel-myocardial infarction and cardiac death, at time-to-first event analysis.

resultsA total of 1279 patients were included, of whom 642 (50.2%) met complex PCI criteria. The most frequently met criteria was "total device length > 60 mm" (71.6% in the complex PCI group). The proportion of in-stent restenosis (ISR) was 30.8% in the complex DCB-PCI group and 43.8% in the non-complex PCI group (p < 0.001). After adjusting for relevant clinical covariates and for the presence of ISR, patients undergoing complex PCI had a higher incidence of TLF at 2 years as compared to those undergoing non-complex PCI (16.7 vs. 11.4%; adj. hazard ratio 1.73, 95% confidence interval 1.16-2.59, p = 0.007). However, such difference was significant only in the ISR subgroup, while outcomes of complex and non-complex PCI for de novo lesions were similar.

conclusionsIn a real-world cohort of patients undergoing DCB angioplasty, complex PCI criteria were frequently met and associated with higher risk of TLF. However, their prognostic impact was limited in patients with de novo coronary lesions treated with DCB.

Indexed as

Angioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryCoated Materials, BiocompatibleCoronary Artery DiseaseDrug-Eluting StentsPercutaneous Coronary InterventionAgedCoronary RestenosisFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCoated Materials, BiocompatibleComplexDrug-coated balloonPercutaneous coronary intervention

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.