Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40387696›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2025

Early health economic analysis of virtual reality therapy for pain management after surgery.

Tjitske D Groenveld, Pim van Dorst, Richard P G Ten Broek, Rianne L M van Boekel, Roderick F van Beek, Simon van der Pol, Harry van Goor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tjitske D GroenveldDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Pim van DorstHealth-Ecore, Zeist, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8401-0932
Richard P G Ten BroekDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Rianne L M van BoekelDepartment of Anesthesiology Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Roderick F van BeekSyncVR Medical B.V., Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
Simon van der PolHealth-Ecore, Zeist, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1784-1001
Harry van GoorDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0323-4876

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVirtual reality (VR) therapy is increasingly used to mitigate pain and anxiety in inpatient settings, with varying effectiveness in postoperative settings. The costs of VR therapy also differ among suppliers. This health-economic analysis aims to inform policy- and decision-makers on the potential impact of VR therapy from a societal perspective based on pain management at discharge and the development of chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP).

methodsA Markov model was developed to simulate 1-year postoperative costs and effects. Using a threshold and headroom analysis, the Incremental Cost-effectiveness Ratio (ICER) was calculated for various VR effectiveness estimates and costs when VR therapy demonstrated cost-effectiveness or cost-savings for postoperative pain management. VR effectiveness was based on opioid use at discharge, affecting the Markov model's initial distribution and CPSP development. The ICER was calculated from quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and costs associated with CPSP. A univariate sensitivity analysis was used to assess parameter uncertainty by varying each parameter by ±20% from the base-case value.

resultsVR therapy needs to reduce opioid use at discharge by at least 2.8% to be cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of €20 000 per QALY and VR costs of €47.48 per patient. To be cost-saving, a reduction of at least 6.5% is needed. The sensitivity analysis indicated that the transition probability from "pain with opioid" to "pain free" in month 2 had the most impact on the ICER. Other significant variables included VR effectiveness and costs, each influencing the ICER by over €5000.

conclusionThe needed 2.8% reduction in opioid use at discharge seems plausible based on literature. However, knowledge gaps regarding the effectiveness of VR, the incidence of chronic postoperative pain, and societal costs of chronic pain need to be addressed, to better understand VR therapy's role in optimizing postoperative pain management.

Indexed as

Pain ManagementPostoperative PainVirtual RealityVirtual Reality Exposure TherapyAnalgesics, OpioidChronic PainCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansMarkov ChainsQuality-Adjusted Life YearsAnalgesics, Opioidchronic postsurgical paincost-effectivenesshealth economic evaluationhealth technology assessmentpain managementpostoperative painvirtual reality therapy

Identifiers

PMID40387696
PMCPMC12165492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.