ArticlePharmacology research & perspectives2025
Integrated Phenotypic and Genotypic Approaches for Accurate Diagnosis of G6PD Deficiency: Implications for Drug Safety in Thailand.
Article in Pharmacology research & perspectives, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Resolving haplotypes of the glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase gene using long-range polymerase chain reaction and Oxford Nanopore sequencing.Biology methods & protocols · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency holds critical health concerns, particularly due to its association with drug-induced hemolysis triggered by medications such as antimalarials. This condition poses significant risks in malaria-endemic regions where the prevalence and genetic diversity of G6PD deficiency further complicate management. Providing accurate and reliable G6PD status is vital to ensuring safe treatment, reducing complications, and improving healthcare outcomes in these populations. This study evaluated the integration of phenotypic and genotypic diagnostic methods for identifying G6PD deficiency in 2953 participants in Thailand. Using the water-soluble tetrazolium salts enzymatic assay and multiplex high-resolution melting analysis, the study revealed an overall prevalence of 3.93%, with 7.19% in males and 1.83% in females. A total of 38 distinct G6PD genotypes were identified, and zygosity was determined, highlighting significant genetic diversity, including previously unreported mutations as identified by sequencing. Hemizygous males, homozygous females, and approximately 50% of heterozygous females with missense mutations exhibited deficient or intermediate phenotypes. However, 40% of females carrying G6PD missense mutations showed a normal phenotype in quantitative phenotypic testing. The findings highlight the need for accurate G6PD diagnosis to improve drug safety and efficacy, particularly for vulnerable individuals such as heterozygous females, who are at risk of hemolysis. The cost-effective, high-throughput methods demonstrated here are suitable for large-scale screening, making them especially valuable in resource-limited settings. To maximize their impact, integrating both phenotypic and genotypic approaches into national healthcare policies and malaria programs is essential. By ensuring equitable access to reliable G6PD testing, these findings support malaria elimination efforts and address broader healthcare challenges, ultimately reducing preventable morbidity and mortality associated with G6PD deficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.