ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2025
Performance of the bioLytical Multiplex HIV 1/2 and Syphilis rapid test on serum in a laboratory evaluation for syphilis.
Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rapid/point-of-care syphilis testing in high-income countries: insights and implementation challenges from the authors' experience in Canada.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2026Review
- Adoption of universal prenatal syphilis rescreening recommendations across Ontario, Canada: a difference-in-differences analysis.BMJ public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Syphilis, a sexually transmitted infection, is resurging with large outbreaks worldwide. In pregnant females, vertical transmission can result in stillbirths and serious sequelae for the fetus. Syphilis serology is primarily used to make the diagnosis, but the testing platforms and confirmatory tests are often centralized; therefore, the time to a result is usually more than 2 days. Most affected populations in the current outbreaks can be transient and easily lost to follow up. Therefore, rapid testing can assist with timely detection, treatment, and linkage to care. We evaluated the performance of the INSTI Multiplex HIV-1/2 Syphilis rapid test, using a large panel of negative and confirmed positive sera with varying rapid plasma reagin (RPR) titers. Sera with RPR titers of 1:8 and greater consistently gave a positive rapid test result (93.8%-100%; 95% CI: 82.5%-100%), whereas samples with RPR titers of 1:2 and lower were often negative (7.6%-56.5%). Rapid test positive samples generally had a syphilis CMIA S/CO ratio of 19.78 and higher, although there was no specific ratio that separated all positive from negative rapid results. In infectious syphilis, RPR titers are often 1:8 and greater and should be reliably detected with this rapid test (accuracy 97.2%), thereby supporting immediate treatment and linkage to care with a high level of confidence. Additionally, a result is available within minutes and therefore could be included on acute care STAT laboratory test menus while the individual is an in-patient or awaiting assessment in the Emergency Department. IMPORTANCE: We examined the performance of the syphilis antibody component of a rapid multiplex device and found that sera with RPR titers of 1:8 and greater, often found in infectious syphilis, were highly likely to test positive. This device would be suitable for providing STAT syphilis serology testing for suspect cases waiting in the Emergency Department or as inpatients. Positive results can support immediate treatment and linkage to care, especially for pregnant females and transient persons who are often lost to follow up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.