Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40387331›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of hematology2025

Classical and Late-Onset SOS/VOD After Allogeneic HSCT: A Japanese Transplant Registry Analysis.

Kyoko Masuda, Keisuke Kataoka, Masatoshi Sakurai, Yuho Najima, Naonori Harada, Shoko Ukita, Naoyuki Uchida, Noriko Doki, Takahiro Fukuda, Masatsugu Tanaka and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Kyoko MasudaDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0009-0007-0811-2647
Keisuke KataokaDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Masatoshi SakuraiDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuho NajimaHematology Division, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8910-0021
Naonori HaradaDepartment of Hematology, Fuchu Hospital, Izumi, Japan.
Shoko UkitaBiostatistics Unit, Clinical and Translational Research Center, Keio University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0009-0007-3042-329X
Naoyuki UchidaDepartment of Hematology, Federation of National Public Service Personnel Mutual Aid Associations Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5952-5926
Noriko DokiHematology Division, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Takahiro FukudaDepartment of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Masatsugu TanakaDepartment of Hematology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Hiroyuki OhigashiDepartment of Hematology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Jun IshikawaDepartment of Hematology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Satoshi YoshiharaDepartment of Hematology, Hyogo Medical University Hospital, Hyogo, Japan.
Masashi SawaDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Anjo Kosei Hospital, Anjo, Japan.
Shuichi OtaDepartment of Hematology, Sapporo Hokuyu Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3631-244X
Yoshinobu KandaDivision of Hematology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4866-9307
Tetsuya NishidaDepartment of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daiichi Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Makoto OnizukaDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan.
Yoshiko AtsutaJapanese Data Center for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Nagoya, Japan.
Hideki NakasoneDivision of Hematology, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5812-9315
Kimikazu YakushijinDivision of Medical Oncology/Hematology, Department of Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2511-7857

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome/veno-occlusive disease (SOS/VOD) is a lethal complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). According to the 2016 European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria, SOS/VOD is classified into classical SOS/VOD and late-onset SOS/VOD, but their similarities and differences remain unclear. Here we retrospectively investigated the incidence, risk factors, and impact on transplant outcomes of classical and late-onset SOS/VOD in 16 518 allo-HSCT recipients using the Japanese nationwide registry data. The cumulative incidences of classical and late-onset SOS/VOD were 2.5% and 2.2%, with a median onset of 13 and 42 days after transplantation, respectively. Both patients with classical (hazard ratio [HR], 3.45; 95% CI, 3.07-3.87) and late-onset (HR, 3.98; 95% CI, 3.51-4.51) SOS/VOD had a significantly worse overall survival compared with those without. The risk factors for classical and late-onset SOS/VOD are different. Hepatic comorbidities, high-risk diseases, use of melphalan (MEL), and myeloablative conditioning are associated with both types of SOS/VOD. Whereas poor performance status, a prior history of transplantation, and positive hepatitis C virus are associated with only classical SOS/VOD, allo-HSCT from cord blood or related human leukocyte antigen-haploidentical donors, use of total body irradiation and busulfan (BU), and tacrolimus-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis are associated with only late-onset SOS/VOD. In particular, the incidence of late-onset SOS/VOD is much higher in patients receiving both BU- and MEL-containing conditioning regimens. These findings suggest that different monitoring and treatment approaches are necessary for allo-HSCT recipients at high risk for classical and late-onset SOS/VOD.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHepatic Veno-Occlusive DiseaseAdolescentAdultAgedAllograftsFemaleHumansIncidenceJapanMaleMelphalanMiddle AgedRegistriesRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsMelphalanallogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantationclassical SOS/VODlate‐onset SOS/VODsinusoidal obstruction syndrome/veno‐occlusive disease

Identifiers

PMID40387331
PMCPMC12232550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.