Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40387306›Full record

ReviewActa paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)2025

The Importance of National Monitoring of Children's Growth: Consensus Statement From the Nordic PromoKids Network.

Liselotte Schäfer Elinder, Lauren Lissner, Annika Janson, Tatjana Hejgaard, Emil Steen Steensen, Ingunn Holden Bergh, Marit Dromnes Manvik, Liv Elin Torheim, Pétur Benedikt Juliusson, Anna S Olafsdottir and 5 more

Abstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Liselotte Schäfer ElinderDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7270-1162
Lauren LissnerDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8296-2849
Annika JansonDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5106-5670
Tatjana HejgaardPrevention and Primary Healthcare, The Danish Health Authority, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Emil Steen SteensenDepartment for Sustainable Diet and Health, The Danish Veterinary and Food Administration, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ingunn Holden BerghDepartment of Health and Inequalities, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-9538-6537
Marit Dromnes ManvikDepartment of Child and Adolescent Health Promotion Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Liv Elin TorheimDepartment of Physical Health and Ageing, Centre for Sustainable Diets, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Pétur Benedikt JuliussonDepartment of Health Register Research and Development, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-7064-1407
Anna S OlafsdottirFaculty of Health Promotion, Sport and Leisure Studies, School of Education, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.ORCID 0000-0002-7258-1727
Ragnar BjarnasonDepartment of Pediatrics, Landspitali-University Hospital, Reykjavík, Iceland.ORCID 0000-0002-7121-9689
Tryggvi HelgasonDepartment of Pediatrics, Landspitali-University Hospital, Reykjavík, Iceland.ORCID 0009-0003-1474-8175
Antti SaariKuopio University Hospital and University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-4977-5432
Heli KuusipaloFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare THL, Helsinki, Finland.
Päivi MäkiFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare THL, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-1023-695X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo describe the current approaches to surveillance and use of data on children's growth in the Nordic countries and to reach consensus on how this can be improved.

methodsMembers of the Promoting Healthy Weight in Children (PromoKids) network and additional public health professionals from five Nordic countries described their respective national growth surveillance systems. The various approaches to data collection and consolidation were analysed and compared.

resultsIn Finland, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and Iceland, all children's weight and height are measured repeatedly at different intervals from birth by child and school health services. However, the data are not consistently registered centrally in all countries for use in public health planning, policymaking and research. Finland and Denmark had the most mature systems for data collection.

conclusionA consensus was reached that surveillance of body weight and height should be a mandatory element of national action plans to prevent and manage growth disorders including obesity, and to identify susceptible population groups. Surveillance protocols should be designed to prevent stigmatisation of children with overweight. Nordic countries should collaborate to accomplish comprehensive data coverage to uncover social inequalities and evaluate societal actions to prevent obesity in children.

Indexed as

Body HeightChild DevelopmentPopulation SurveillanceBody WeightChildChild, PreschoolHumansScandinavian and Nordic Countriesgrowth monitoringhealth promotionnational growth dataobesityregistersurveillance

Identifiers

PMID40387306
PMCPMC12336950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.