Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40387304›Full record

ReviewMedical education2025

From challenge to growth: Exploring physician narratives of patient complaints during residency.

Allan McDougall, Fernanda Claudio, Catherine Pound, Karen Pacheco, Jacqueline Fortier, Gary Garber

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Allan McDougallThe Canadian Medical Protective Association, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0418-0614
Fernanda ClaudioThe Canadian Medical Protective Association, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Catherine PoundThe Canadian Medical Protective Association, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Karen PachecoThe Canadian Medical Protective Association, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Jacqueline FortierThe Canadian Medical Protective Association, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Gary GarberThe Canadian Medical Protective Association, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatient complaints are an important feedback mechanism for healthcare quality improvement and medical education, and their impact on postgraduate medical trainees (residents) remains under-explored. This study investigates the narratives of physicians who received formal patient complaints during residency, focusing on how these incidents influenced their professional development and career trajectories.

methodsUsing narrative inquiry, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 35 physicians who experienced formal patient complaints during their residency. We applied Ricoeur's narrative theory to explore the impact of these complaints on physicians.

resultsThe analysis revealed two main elements of participants' narratives: emplotment and refiguration. During emplotment, participants initially constructed narratives centered on distress and stigma, often positioning themselves as confused and isolated. This process frequently involved a reevaluation of their professional capabilities and identity as an effective physician. Refiguration demonstrated how participants integrated these experiences into their long-term professional identities, revealing impacts on clinical practices, specialty choices and career paths. Despite initial challenges, many participants reframed their early complaint experiences as catalysts for professional growth, particularly in areas such as communication and collegial support.

conclusionsPatient complaints during residency can have a destabilizing effect on professional identity formation. However, supportive educational environments and adequate mentorship can mitigate these effects and enhance learning. This study underscores the need for medical education programmes to incorporate systems that support residents in effectively addressing and learning from patient complaints while maintaining a focus on patient safety and quality improvement.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyNarrationPatient SatisfactionPhysiciansAdultCommunicationFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMalePhysician-Patient RelationsQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID40387304
PMCPMC12513549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.