Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40387265›Full record

ArticleThe Laryngoscope2025

Synchrotron-Based Trauma Assessment of Robotic Electrode Insertions in Cochlear Implantation.

Joseph M Chen, Vincent Y W Lin, Trung N Le, Jennifer L Spiegel, Omer J Ungar, Munir D Bajin, Hanif M Ladak, Sumit Agrawal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Laryngoscope, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Early Clinical Experience With Robot-Assisted Electrode Insertion in Cochlear Implantation Using the Otoarm-Otodrive System.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale
    Article
  5. Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Robot-Assisted Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Insertion.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Joseph M ChenDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Vincent Y W LinDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0505-158X
Trung N LeDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jennifer L SpiegelDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6187-0195
Omer J UngarDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5904-1291
Munir D BajinDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Western University London, London, Ontario, Canada.
Hanif M LadakDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Western University London, London, Ontario, Canada.
Sumit AgrawalDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Western University London, London, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI)Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)Government of Saskatchewan, and the University of SaskatchewanNational Research Council (NRC)Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMinimizing intraoperative trauma during cochlear implant electrode insertion is crucial for preserving residual hearing. Manual insertions are subject to variability due to surgeon experience and anatomical differences, often leading to inconsistent outcomes. Robotic-assisted systems have been developed to improve insertion precision and reduce trauma. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of the OTODRIVE system for cochlear implant electrode insertion.

methodsFifteen cadaveric human temporal bones were implanted with a variety of electrodes (FLEX26, FLEX28, FLEXSOFT, FLEX34) and an inner ear catheter (INCAT). The OTODRIVE system was used to maintain a constant insertion speed of 0.1 mm/s. The samples were subsequently imaged using synchrotron radiation phase-contrast imaging (SR-PCI) to assess intracochlear trauma. Parameters such as linear and angular insertion depths and cochlear coverage were measured. The presence of trauma was analyzed using a trauma evaluation plot.

resultsThe average linear insertion depth was 24.8 ± 3.5 mm, and the average angular insertion depth was 527° ± 81°. Cochlear coverage was 74% ± 7%. Only one case of partial scala media translocation and two cases of basilar membrane elevation were observed, with no instances of severe trauma such as tip fold-over, scala vestibuli translocation, or osseous spiral lamina fracture.

conclusionThe findings indicate that the OTODRIVE system enables consistent and controlled electrode placement while minimizing trauma to cochlear structures, suggesting its potential to enhance hearing and structural preservation outcomes. Further clinical studies are required to establish the long-term benefits of robotic-assisted techniques over manual insertions in routine cochlear implantation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.

Indexed as

CochleaCochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsRobotic Surgical ProceduresSynchrotronsTemporal BoneCadaverElectrodes, ImplantedHumanscochlear implantationinsertion traumaOTODRIVErobotic insertionsynchrotron

Identifiers

PMID40387265
PMCPMC12475551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.