ArticleWorld journal of surgery2025
Utility of ABI and API Versus CTA to Identify Surgically Significant Arterial Injury After Lower Extremity Trauma in a LMIC.
Article in World journal of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Infrared thermography and dual-layer spectral CT for the detection of femoral vascular compromise: an experimental large animal study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSouth Africa faces a high burden of trauma-related vascular injury. Prompt diagnosis and management are crucial to limit morbidity and mortality. Literature recommends a thorough vascular examination of at-risk patients. Ankle brachial index (ABI) and arterial pressure index (API) are considered reliable screening tools for lower extremity vascular injury (LEVI) in the correct clinical scenario. Patients with an abnormal ABI/API warrant diagnostic imaging with computed tomography angiography (CTA). However, recent international literature demonstrates a trend toward potential CTA overuse in the work up for LEVI, when the internationally recommended vascular injury work-up guidelines are not followed correctly.
aimTo assess the reliability of ABI/API in trauma patients with suspected LEVI as a screening tool to safely avoid unnecessary CTA.
methodsA retrospective cohort study of all lower extremity trauma patients with soft signs of LEVI who presented to Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital from February 1, 2018 to January 31, 2020 was undertaken. Sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and PPV were calculated for ABI/API versus CTA and ABI/API/CTA versus surgically significant arterial injury. A p-value < 0.05 indicated statistical significance (confidence level = 95%).
resultsFour hundred and thirty-three CTAs were performed for suspected traumatic LEVI. Two hundred and eighty-two were excluded due to missing data (precluding retrospective calculation of ABI/API) and 151 patients were included. To detect surgically significant injury, CTA had a 100% sensitivity, 97.2% specificity, 100% NPV, and 69.2% PPV; ABI and API had a 100% sensitivity, 83.8%-85.9% specificity, 100% NPV, and 28.1%-35.9% PPV, respectively. Neither ABI nor API missed surgically significant arterial injuries.
conclusionThis affirms the reliability of ABI/API as a screening tool to identify patients at risk of LEVI from penetrating trauma. Findings supported international data demonstrating CTA overuse in this subset of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.