ArticleANZ journal of surgery2025
Time to Computed Tomography for Major Trauma Patients: 10-Year Trends at a Level-1 Trauma Centre.
Article in ANZ journal of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Heterogeneity in Self-Reported Management of Blunt Chest Trauma: An International Cross-Sectional Survey.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- IMPACT Requests: Evaluating the Effectiveness of IMPACT Education for Emergency Department Referrers to Improve the Quality of CT Requests.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2026Article
- Abdominal gunshot wounds: evaluating the role of computed tomography in surgical timing and decision-making.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2026Article
- Injury Patterns and Predictors of Delays to Obtaining Computed Tomography in the North Region of Cameroon.Radiology research and practice · 2026Article
- Time to Computed Tomography for Major Trauma Patients: 10-Year Trends at a Level-1 Trauma Centre.ANZ journal of surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionComputed tomography (CT) is an essential part of trauma patient initial workup. Rapid performance of CT has become the standard of care in most parts of the world. This study aims to assess if the time to CT has changed over a 10-year period at the study centre and examine the potential impact on patient outcomes.
methodsA retrospective audit of prospectively collected trauma registry from 2010 to 2019 was performed, including trauma presentations to John Hunter Hospital (n = 9712) with injury severity score above 15. CT data, including start time, end time, time to CT and body region imaged, were collected from RIS-PACS.
resultsTime to CT over the 10-year period ranged from 6 to 299, with a mean of 92 min. Regression analysis showed no overall change in time to CT. Patients who arrived intubated, polytrauma patients and those with isolated head injuries had faster time to CT. Longer time to CT was seen in patients hypotensive on arrival.
conclusionsTime to CT in trauma patients has not changed over a 10-year period, remaining below international standards. In-hospital mortality of major trauma patients at our institution continued to decrease over the study timeframe, resulting in one of the lowest risk-adjusted mortality rates in the country. Development and publication of an Australian KPI for Time to CT in Trauma patients is an important next step in Australian trauma policy and guidelines. This study will serve as a baseline for reassessment of trauma patient initial management workflow within the hospital following the addition of a new acute care services block, protocols for suitable major trauma patients to bypass the emergency resuscitation bay, and a CT hybrid room through our institution's expansion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.