ArticleThe Australian journal of rural health2025
The Double-Edged Sword of Translational Research: Stakeholder Perspectives of the Enablers and Challenges Implementing Anorexia Nervosa Treatment in Rural Health Settings.
Article in The Australian journal of rural health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the translational research processes that emerged at the early phase of the implementation of telehealth-delivered family-based therapy (FBT) for young people with anorexia nervosa (AN) attending Australian rural health services.
settingCommencing mid-2019, five rural health districts across New South Wales (NSW) participated in the study.
participantsNine stakeholders, including study coordinators, clinicians and eating disorder coordinators, participated in a semi-structured interview during the early implementation of telehealth-delivered FBT.
designInductive thematic analysis methodology was used to identify key research factors that enabled and challenged the implementation.
resultsThe translational research improved patient access to evidence-based care, afforded health services access to clinical expertise, workforce training and supervision and assisted with meeting government directives of improving care pathways. However, the study and intervention implementation were challenged by research-related factors, including ethical and clinical dilemmas, the burden of stakeholders holding multiple roles and general challenges associated with integrating research into non-academic health services.
conclusionTo optimise implementation and to bridge the access gaps particularly felt by rural families and health settings, translational studies ought to consider the enablers and challenges identified by the stakeholders.
trial registrationACTRN12620001107910.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.