Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40387022›Full record

ReviewActa ophthalmologica2026

Outsourced eye care in the Finnish capital region: Switching from fee-for-service to bundled payment model.

Susanna Moisander, Jukka Ari Olavi Moilanen, Hans Henrik Konstantin Backström, Olga Marjasova, Marko Juhani Myöhänen, Taina Pauliina Nykänen, Mikko Juhani Pietilä, Paulus Torkki

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta ophthalmologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Susanna MoisanderDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospital Nova, The wellbeing services county of Central Finland, Jyväskylä, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8750-1988
Jukka Ari Olavi MoilanenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Hans Henrik Konstantin BackströmSOK Corporation, Helsinki, Finland.
Olga MarjasovaEVLI Fund Management Company, Helsinki, Finland.
Marko Juhani MyöhänenElisa Oyj, Helsinki, Finland.
Taina Pauliina NykänenMehiläinen Bulevardi Medical Clinic & Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Mikko Juhani PietiläTurku University Hospital, The welbeing services county of Southwest Finland, Turku, Finland.
Paulus TorkkiDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

Suomen Silmälääkäriyhdistyksen
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe demand for specialised eye care has quadrupled over the last two decades, driven by an aging population and the advent of new treatments. This surge has led to increased outsourcing by the Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District (HUS) Eye Hospital, initially relying on a fee-for-service model. This model, however, has been marked by excessive bureaucracy and transaction costs. Between 2019 and 2021, HUS Eye Hospital embarked on a comparative analysis of outsourcing models to identify the most cost-effective, efficient and suitable approach.

methodsAfter the review of literature and stakeholder interviews, three different outsourcing models were assessed: fee-for-service, capitation and bundled payment. The models were evaluated against each other and HUS insourcing using SWOT analysis, custom-made evaluation matrices and cost analysis.

resultsThe evaluation identified bundled payments as the most promising model for HUS eye care outsourcing. Under this model, patients diagnosed with or suspected of having eye diseases are referred to external service providers for a predetermined period, encompassing follow-up and treatment, with providers receiving a fixed payment for each assigned patient.

conclusionDetermining the optimal outsourcing model for HUS Eye Hospital was a complex process and necessitated the development of a new quality control system. The selection of bundled payment as the preferred method required an adaptation of it to the national requirements and legislation. While bundled payments have been successfully implemented in other medical specialties, their application in ophthalmology is novel, with forthcoming data from HUS Eye Hospital expected to shed further light on its effectiveness.

Indexed as

Eye DiseasesFee-for-Service PlansOphthalmologyOutsourced ServicesCost-Benefit AnalysisFinlandHumansbundled paymentfee‐for‐serviceophthalmologyoutsourcingreimbursement

Identifiers

PMID40387022
PMCPMC12803638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.