ReviewActa ophthalmologica2026
Outsourced eye care in the Finnish capital region: Switching from fee-for-service to bundled payment model.
Review in Acta ophthalmologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Outsourced eye care in the Finnish capital region: Switching from fee-for-service to bundled payment model.Acta ophthalmologica · 2026Review
- Impact of the volume-based procurement for intraocular lenses combined with the diagnosis-related group's payment reform on hospitalization costs and expenditure structure among cataract patients: an interrupted time series analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe demand for specialised eye care has quadrupled over the last two decades, driven by an aging population and the advent of new treatments. This surge has led to increased outsourcing by the Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District (HUS) Eye Hospital, initially relying on a fee-for-service model. This model, however, has been marked by excessive bureaucracy and transaction costs. Between 2019 and 2021, HUS Eye Hospital embarked on a comparative analysis of outsourcing models to identify the most cost-effective, efficient and suitable approach.
methodsAfter the review of literature and stakeholder interviews, three different outsourcing models were assessed: fee-for-service, capitation and bundled payment. The models were evaluated against each other and HUS insourcing using SWOT analysis, custom-made evaluation matrices and cost analysis.
resultsThe evaluation identified bundled payments as the most promising model for HUS eye care outsourcing. Under this model, patients diagnosed with or suspected of having eye diseases are referred to external service providers for a predetermined period, encompassing follow-up and treatment, with providers receiving a fixed payment for each assigned patient.
conclusionDetermining the optimal outsourcing model for HUS Eye Hospital was a complex process and necessitated the development of a new quality control system. The selection of bundled payment as the preferred method required an adaptation of it to the national requirements and legislation. While bundled payments have been successfully implemented in other medical specialties, their application in ophthalmology is novel, with forthcoming data from HUS Eye Hospital expected to shed further light on its effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.