ArticleAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2025
Glycosylation Gene Signatures as Prognostic Biomarkers in Glioblastoma.
Article in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveGlioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive brain tumor characterized by significant heterogeneity. This study investigates the role of glycosylation-related genes in GBM subtyping, prognosis, and response to therapy.
methodsWe analyzed mRNA expression data and clinical information from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases. Glycosylation-related genes were selected for differential expression analysis, sample clustering, and survival analysis. Immune cell infiltration and drug sensitivity were evaluated using CIBERSORT and oncoPredict, respectively. A prognostic model was constructed with Lasso regression.
resultsGBM samples were stratified into two glycosylation-related subtypes, showing distinct survival outcomes, with higher glycosylation expression correlating with poorer prognosis. Immune microenvironment analysis revealed differences in T-cell infiltration and immune checkpoint expression between subtypes, indicating variable immunotherapy responses. The prognostic model based on glycosylation genes demonstrated significant predictive value for patient survival.
conclusionGlycosylation-related gene expression contributes to GBM heterogeneity and is a valuable biomarker for prognosis and treatment stratification. This study provides insights into personalized treatment approaches for GBM based on glycosylation-related molecular subtypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.