Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40386991›Full record

ArticlePlant biology (Stuttgart, Germany)2025

Are lichens biocompasses? Revisiting an old prediction using new techniques.

B B S Nunes, A Braga, M E M Marques, I Lopes, J C F Cardoso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

B B S NunesPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia, Conservação e Biodiversidade, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
A BragaCentro do Biociências e Biotecnologia, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
M E M MarquesInstituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
I LopesDepartamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
J C F CardosoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia, Conservação e Manejo da Vida Silvestre, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0411-8159

Funding

Brazilian Biodivesity Fund N° 071/2024Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais APQ-03249-22Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais RED-00039-23Universidade Federal de Uberlândia PROGEP n° 5/2021 process n° 23117.030449/2022-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abiotic factors influence not only vertical distributions of epiphytes, but also their radial positioning, such as around tree trunks. Due to planetary patterns of solar incidence, the equator-facing trunk portions receive direct sunlight, creating restrictive microclimatic conditions. Conversely, pole-facing portions remain shaded, providing optimal conditions for some epiphytes. Since trunk microhabitats are continuous, the distribution of epiphytes involves directional (compass-derived) data, requiring circular analytical methods. However, such assessments remain unexplored for avascular epiphytes. In the southern hemisphere, we investigated radial distribution of all lichen crustose and foliose thalli occurring on concentric trunks of a Syagrus oleracea population. We hypothesized that: (1) both lichen types will orient southward, the optimal zone; (2) lichen types do not differ in preferred direction, indicating a stronger microenvironmental than interaction filter; and (3) other variables (height, phorophyte size, canopy cover) do not affect orientation, which is primarily governed by azimuth. We address these questions using circular statistics, including preferred direction tests, between-sample comparisons, and linear-circular regressions. We surveyed 845 lichen thalli (180 crustose, 665 foliose). The lichens were non-uniformly distributed and oriented southward, with similar distributions. Radial orientation was unaffected by height, canopy cover, or phorophyte size, confirming azimuth as the primary determinant of orientation. These results demonstrate how abiotic conditions, driven by planetary patterns, indirectly determine lichen niche occupation on a fine radial dimension of trunks, offering new insights into epiphyte ecology.

Indexed as

LichensEcosystemCircular statisticsenvironmental filtersepiphytic plantsradial orientation

Identifiers

PMID40386991
PMCPMC12477300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.