Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40386988›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2025

Uncovering stage-specific neural and molecular progression in Alzheimer's disease: Implications for early screening.

Yun Lin, Xue Shi, Jia Mu, Huixia Ren, Xiaosen Jiang, Lin Zhu, Xingya Cai, Chongyuan Lian, Zian Pei, Yongfang Zhang and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Yun LinInstitute of Intelligent Medical Research (IIMR), BGI Genomics, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Xue ShiDepartment of Neurology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Jia MuInstitute of Intelligent Medical Research (IIMR), BGI Genomics, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Huixia RenDepartment of Geriatrics, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Xiaosen JiangBGI Research, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Lin ZhuDepartment of Neurology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Xingya CaiInstitute of Intelligent Medical Research (IIMR), BGI Genomics, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Chongyuan LianShenzhen Bay Laboratory, Gaoke Innovation Center, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Zian PeiDepartment of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Yongfang ZhangInstitute of Intelligent Medical Research (IIMR), BGI Genomics, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Cong WangBGI Genomics, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Guixue HouBGI Genomics, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Liang LinBGI Genomics, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Chao NieBGI Research, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Cai SongBGI Research, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Shuyang GaoBGI Genomics, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Lijian ZhaoBGI Genomics, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Jian WangBGI Genomics, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Xin JiangDepartment of Geriatrics, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Jing WangInstitute of Intelligent Medical Research (IIMR), BGI Genomics, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Yi GuoDepartment of Neurology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.

Funding

National Key R&D Program of China 2023YFC3603300Natural Science Foundation of China 82371471Research Program of Central Health Commission 2024YB59Special Foundation for Shenzhen Basic Research Program JCYJ20240813103817024the Ministry of Science and Technology of China 2022ZD0211600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUnderstanding molecular, neuroanatomical, and neurophysiological changes in cognitive decline is crucial for comprehending Alzheimer's disease (AD) progression and facilitating objective staging and early screening.

methodsWe enrolled 277 participants and employed a multimodal approach, integrating genomics, metagenomics, metabolomics, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and electroencephalogram (EEG) to investigate the AD continuum, from subjective cognitive decline (SCD) through mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to advanced AD.

resultsKey markers and mechanisms were identified for each stage: initial neurophysiological deficits in SCD with compensatory metabolomic responses, gut-brain axis dysregulation in MCI, and extensive metabolic disruption and multisystem breakdown in AD. Using random forest models, we identified specific feature combinations that achieved predictive areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.78 for SCD, 0.84 for MCI, and 0.98 for AD, highlighting EEG as a particularly effective early screening tool. DISCUSSION: This study elucidates AD's pathophysiological progression and highlights the potential of machine learning-assisted multimodal strategies for early detection and staging. HIGHLIGHTS: Early electroencephalogram (EEG) changes and compensatory metabolomic responses define subjective cognitive decline (SCD) stage. In mild cognitive impairment (MCI), gut-brain axis dysfunction alters microbial diversity and functional pathways. In Alzheimer's disease (AD), systemic breakdown disruption enables near-perfect machine learning (ML) detection. Random forest models yield predictive areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.78 (SCD), 0.84 (MCI), 0.98 (AD). EEG is a convenient, cost-efficient marker for early screening.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersBrainDisease ProgressionEarly DiagnosisElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMetabolomicsBiomarkersAlzheimer's disease (AD)EEGgut microbiotamachine learningmetabolomicsmild cognitive impairment (MCI)MRImulti‐omicsneuroimagingsubjective cognitive decline (SCD)

Identifiers

PMID40386988
PMCPMC12086656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.