Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40386923›Full record

ReviewEFORT open reviews2024

Consensus review on peri-implant femur fracture treatment: Peri-Implant Spanish Consensus (PISCO) investigators' recommendations.

Pablo Castillón, Josep Maria Muñoz Vives, Héctor José Aguado, Arantxa Capel Agundez, Alina Ortega-Briones, Jorge Hassan Núñez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EFORT open reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Peri-periprosthetic femoral fractures: a single-centre case series of a rare and challenging clinical scenario.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pablo CastillónDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital, Universitari Mútua Terrassa, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2348-0863
Josep Maria Muñoz VivesDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital Althaia Manresa. Manresa, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6239-180X
Héctor José AguadoDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid. Valladolid, Spain.
Arantxa Capel AgundezDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Alina Ortega-BrionesDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid. Valladolid, Spain.
Jorge Hassan NúñezDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital, Universitari Mútua Terrassa, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A peri-implant femoral fracture (PIFF) is defined as a femoral fracture in the presence of a pre-existing non-prosthetic implant. Classification systems, treatment guidelines and fixation strategies exist for peri-prosthetic fractures, but there is no standard of care regarding PIFFs. The aim of the Peri-Implant Spanish Consensus (aka PISCO) investigators is to reach an agreement regarding current practices for management of PIFFs and to propose four main principles to assess surgical treatment and prevention of these fractures. This consensus review was conducted according to the Delphi method. Twenty-two expert orthopaedic trauma surgeons performed the consensus and the definitive statements were approved unanimously. Biological fixation principles must be utilized in the surgical treatment of peri-implant femur fractures, which include closed or minimally invasive reduction techniques. The osteosynthesis must protect the entire bone. Gaps between two implants should be avoided. If implant overlap is not possible to achieve, then spanning inter-implant fixation systems must be used, especially in osteoporotic bone. Previous implants should be retained during surgical treatment of peri-implant femur fractures. Only those implants that would interfere with current fixation goals should be removed. If the previous implant is in the femoral neck region, then femoral neck protection must be maintained when treating the peri-implant fracture, even if the neck fracture has already healed.

Indexed as

consensusfemurhip fractureperi-implant fractures

Identifiers

PMID40386923
PMCPMC10823565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.