Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40386800›Full record

ArticleNature physics2025

Yielding behaviour of active particles in bulk and in confinement.

Yagyik Goswami, G V Shivashankar, Srikanth Sastry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yagyik GoswamiTheoretical Sciences Unit and School of Advanced Materials, Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Bengaluru, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1175-7108
G V ShivashankarLaboratory of Multiscale Bioimaging, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.
Srikanth SastryTheoretical Sciences Unit and School of Advanced Materials, Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Bengaluru, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7399-1835

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collective behaviour in dense assemblies of self-propelled active particles occurs in a wide range of biological phenomena, including the dynamical transitions of cellular and subcellular biological assemblies such as the cytoskeleton and the cell nucleus. Here, motivated by observations of mechanically induced changes in the dynamics of such systems and the apparent role of confinement geometry, we show that the fluidization transition broadly resembles yielding in amorphous solids, which is consistent with recent suggestions. More specifically, however, we find that a detailed analogy holds with the yielding transition under cyclic shear deformation, for large but finite persistence times. The fluidization transition is accompanied by driving-induced annealing, strong dependence on the initial state of the system, a divergence of timescales to reach steady states and a discontinuous onset of diffusive motion. We also observe a striking dependence of transition on persistence times and on the nature of confinement. Collectively, our results have implications for biological assemblies in confined geometries, including epigenetic cell-state transitions.

Indexed as

Biological physicsStatistical physics

Identifiers

PMID40386800
PMCPMC12084156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.