ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Dynamics of neutrophil phenotype and function in sickle cell disease.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: While sickle cell disease (SCD) is primarily acknowledged as an erythrocyte disorder, emerging evidence suggests a role for altered neutrophil phenotype and function in SCD pathophysiology and disease severity. Given the conflicting findings in previous studies, we performed a comprehensive exploration of neutrophil characteristics in SCD patients during steady state and vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC), as well as in response to therapeutic interventions. Methods: Neutrophil phenotype was assessed by flow cytometry and functional properties were evaluated by measurement of neutrophil adhesion and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. Results: A total of 49 SCD patients (of whom 19 during both steady state and VOC) along with 16 healthy ethnicity-matched and 30 non-matched controls, were included in the study. Differences were observed between neutrophils from patients compared to controls and between control groups. Neutrophil phenotype was more activated in SCD patients compared to non-matched controls. Neutrophil adhesion was increased in steady-state SCD patients compared to both ethnicity-matched and non-matched controls. Discussion: While neutrophil phenotype in SCD patients differed from non-matched controls, in contrast to earlier studies, the differences in neutrophil phenotype between SCD patients and ethnicity-matched controls were modest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.