ReviewFrontiers in immunology2025
Recent advances of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for acute myeloid leukemia.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preclinical advances and mechanistic insights of CAR-T therapy for acute myeloid leukemia: from target iteration to microenvironment regulation.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- Leukemia-targeting NK cell nanoengagers effectively promote robust NK activation and potent anti-acute myeloid leukemia response.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- Hijacking the helpers: platelet and neutrophil trafficking in AML and therapeutic exploitation.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- Next-generation CAR-T therapy for acute myeloid leukemia: bridging innovation with clinical translation.Annals of hematology · 2026Review
- Humanized anti-CD33 CAR-T cells and antibody-drug conjugates for targeted therapy in acute myeloid leukemia.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Pandora's Box of AML: HowBiomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneously primary hematopoietic neoplasm characterized by uncontrolled proliferation of immature myeloid cells, which is characterized with poor outcomes. Despite tremendous advances in the treatment paradigm of AML in the past several decades, the cure and prognosis remain unfavorable. More effective treatments are therefore needed to improve the clinical outcomes. Among newly emerging immunotherapies, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell immunotherapy is an exceedingly promising approach that has remarkably improved the overall survival for patients with AML. However, current CAR-T cell therapy for AML faces numerous significant challenges such as the identification of truly AML-specific surface antigens, the on-target/off-tumor toxicity, and the immunosuppressive microenvironment of AML. In order to conquer these limitations, novel strategies to advance CAR-T therapy are urgently needed. In this comprehensive review, we summarize the current status of immunotherapy, especially CAR-T cell therapy, highlight the outcomes of current trials and the limitations of CAR-T immunotherapy, hopefully to provide novel insights into the future directions of CAR-T cells in AML.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.