Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40386737›Full record

ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2025

Comparing neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and derived NLR as predictive biomarkers in first-line immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study.

Elise Longueville, Maxime Dewolf, Véronique Dalstein, Anne Durlach, Alexandre Vivien, Béatrice Nawrocki-Raby, Myriam Polette, Gaëtan Deslée, Julien Ancel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elise LonguevilleRespiratory Diseases Department, University Hospital of Reims, Reims, France.
Maxime DewolfRespiratory Diseases Department, University Hospital of Reims, Reims, France.
Véronique DalsteinINSERM UMR-S 1250, P3Cell, University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Reims, France.
Anne DurlachINSERM UMR-S 1250, P3Cell, University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Reims, France.
Alexandre VivienRespiratory Diseases Department, University Hospital of Reims, Reims, France.
Béatrice Nawrocki-RabyINSERM UMR-S 1250, P3Cell, University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Reims, France.
Myriam PoletteINSERM UMR-S 1250, P3Cell, University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Reims, France.
Gaëtan DesléeRespiratory Diseases Department, University Hospital of Reims, Reims, France.
Julien AncelRespiratory Diseases Department, University Hospital of Reims, Reims, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3128-9348

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lung cancer, especially non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), poses a significant global health challenge due to its high prevalence and poor prognosis despite treatment advancements, including immunotherapy. While programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is a commonly used biomarker, its limitations justify exploration of alternative markers like the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and derived NLR (dNLR). This retrospective study aims to directly compare NLR, ANC and dNLR as predictive biomarkers in first-line NSCLC immunotherapy, shedding light on their prognostic implications and potential clinical utility. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 70 consecutive patients diagnosed with metastatic NSCLC, treated in first-line with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) between September 2015 and March 2023 at the University Hospital of Reims, France. Baseline clinical characteristics and hematological values were collected, and survival analysis, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), was performed based on RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria. NLR and dNLR were calculated, and their predictive performances were assessed. Results: Baseline characteristics revealed a median age of 65.5 years, predominantly adenocarcinoma histology (82.9%), and high PD-L1 expression (≥50%) in 61.4% of cases. Neither NLR, ANC nor dNLR showed significant associations with known clinical outcome influencers like age, PD-L1 expression, or performance status, but dNLR correlated significantly with initial response (P=0.02). While NLR ≥5 was significantly associated with shorter PFS and OS (P=0.03 and P<0.001, respectively), dNLR >2.5 (P=0.008) or ANC >7.5 (P=0.02) showed significance in predicting poorer OS only. Optimal cut-off values were determined as 5.0 for NLR [area under the curve (AUC) =0.570], 9.00 for ANC (AUC =0.683) and 2.496 for dNLR (AUC =0.610) for OS prediction. Cox regressions revealed no significant association between either biomarker and clinical or histological cofactors. Subgroup analyses suggested NLR's predictive consistency across various subgroups, whereas dNLR and ANC showed limited performance. Both biomarkers demonstrated significant association with OS in patients exposed to ICI alone, but not with chemotherapy combination. Conclusions: The results underscore the potential of NLR as a predictor of survival and progression in NSCLC patients treated with immunotherapy, while dNLR and ANC demonstrate more limited interest. However, larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these observations and further elucidate their clinical utility.

Indexed as

biomarkerderived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR)immunotherapyneutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Identifiers

PMID40386737
PMCPMC12082228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.