Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40386698›Full record

ReviewJournal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures)2025

Management strategies and outcomes predictors of interstitial lung disease exacerbation admitted to an intensive care setting: A narrative review.

Ans Alamami

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Severe acute respiratory distress syndrome in a woman infected with Ascaris lumbricoides.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ans AlamamiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a cluster of diseases that affect the lungs, characterized by different degrees of inflammation and fibrosis within the parenchyma. In the intensive care unit (ICU), ILD poses substantial challenges because of its complicated nature and high morbidity and mortality rates in severe cases. ILD pathophysiology frequently entails persistent inflammation that results in fibrosis, disrupting the typical structure and function of the lung. Patients with ILD frequently experience dyspnea, non-productive cough, and tiredness. In the ICU setting, these symptoms may worsen and lead to signs of acute respiratory failure with significantly impaired gas physiology. Methodology: A systematic search was conducted in reputable databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase. To ensure a comprehensive search, a combination of keywords such as "interstitial lung disease," "intensive care," and "outcomes" was used. Studies published within the last ten years reporting on the outcomes of ILD patients admitted to intensive care included. Result: Effective management of ILD in an ICU setting is challenging and requires a comprehensive approach to address the triggering factor and providing respiratory support, Hypoxemia severity is a critical predictor of mortality, with lower PaO Conclusion: This literature review points out outcome predictors of interstitial lung disease in intensive care units, which are mainly hypoxemia, the severity of the illness, invasive ventilation, the presence of shock, and the extent of fibrosis on CT Images.

Indexed as

diffuse parenchymal lung diseaseICUILD

Identifiers

PMID40386698
PMCPMC12080564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.