Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40386697›Full record

ArticleJournal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures)2025

Use of prone position in spontaneous breathing in patients with COVID-19.

Rodrigo Cerqueira Borges, Isadora Salvador Rocco, Camila Botana Alves Ferreira, Mauricio Kenzo Tobara, Cristiane Helena Papacidero, Vanessa Chaves Barreto Ferreira, Andrey Wirgues Sousa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rodrigo Cerqueira BorgesHospital Samaritano Higienópolis, São Paulo, Brazil.
Isadora Salvador RoccoUniversidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Camila Botana Alves FerreiraHospital Samaritano Higienópolis, São Paulo, Brazil.
Mauricio Kenzo TobaraHospital Samaritano Higienópolis, São Paulo, Brazil.
Cristiane Helena PapacideroHospital Samaritano Higienópolis, São Paulo, Brazil.
Vanessa Chaves Barreto FerreiraHospital Samaritano Higienópolis, São Paulo, Brazil.
Andrey Wirgues SousaHospital Samaritano Higienópolis, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To investigate if awake prone position (PP) reduces the rate of endotracheal intubation and mortality in patients with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of 726 patients who were admitted to the ICU with acute hypoxic respiratory failure secondary to COVID-19. The protocol of the institution recommended the use of awake PP in patients with nasal catheter with an oxygen flow ≥ 5 L/min and SpO Results: There was a higher mortality rate in the supine position group (27.1%) than in the awake PP group (13.9%). There was no significant difference in the time on MV or number of patients on MV (p>0.05). The variables with p < 0.05 in the bivariate analysis were entered into the Cox regression model. The model was adjusted for awake PP, sex, age, SAPS-3 score, onset of symptoms, the degree of pulmonary involvement, chronic arterial disease, and noninvasive ventilation. The only variable associated with lower mortality over time was awake PP (hazard ratio: 0.55; 95% confidence interval: 0.33-0.92). Conclusion: Awake prone position has been shown to be a safe and effective therapy that reduced mortality but not the risk of intubation in patients with COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19ICUprone position

Identifiers

PMID40386697
PMCPMC12080528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.