ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Development and validation of the Chinese version of the conditional reasoning test for implicit aggression in college students.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to develop an implicit aggression conditional reasoning test suitable for college students and to test its reliability and validity. Methods: Based on an in-depth literature review and expert interviews, the research team identified the theoretical structure of college students' implicit aggression and the initial items. Through methods such as exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and reliability and validity testing, the final test scale was formulated and optimized. Results: The final implicit aggression conditional reasoning test for college students contained 18 items across six dimensions: hostility attribution bias, target degradation bias, potency bias, revenge bias, oppression bias, and social discounting bias. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the scale had good construct validity (χ Conclusion: The development of the implicit aggression conditional reasoning test for college students meets the initial theoretical predictions, and its reliability and validity indicators satisfy the requirements of psychometrics, providing an effective tool for assessing and researching implicit aggression among college students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.