ArticleJournal of chemical education2025
Investigation into the Impact of Online Learning and the Pandemic on Student Use of Mechanistic Arrows.
Article in Journal of chemical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The impact of the COVID pandemic on student learning is still being felt more than two years after most classes returned to face-to-face instruction. In this study we investigate how the pandemic and the subsequent return to in-person instruction in an organic chemistry course impacted student performance on a pair of tasks for which we have historical data from pre-COVID courses. These tasks require students to draw mechanisms and predict products for two reactions: (1) a familiar reaction that students have been explicitly taught and (2) a reaction that requires students to use their knowledge to predict how an unfamiliar starting material will behave Analysis of the student responses for the familiar task showed that the 2022 (COVID cohort did not perform as well as in earlier studies), but by spring 2023 post COVID students had returned to a more normal pattern of performance that aligned well with our historical pre-COVID data (2018). In contrast, for the historically more difficult unfamiliar reaction, there was no significant difference among the cohorts' ability to draw a plausible mechanism and predict a product over the three years of the study. That is there appeared to be a cadre of students who were able to complete this task despite the stress of a pandemic and changing instructional modalities. However, the percentage of students who were able to complete this unfamiliar task is typically less than 50% of the total. The implications of these findings are discussed.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.