ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2025
Claudin 18 immunohistochemistry in cholangiocarcinoma.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intra- and intertumoral discordance of Claudin-18.2: a systematic review and meta-analysis.ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Review
- Claudin 18.2 Expression in Cholangiocarcinoma: Clinicopathological Heterogeneity, Prognostic Significance, and Impact of Positivity Thresholds.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Predictive Immunohistochemistry in Cholangiocarcinoma: Current Clinical Utility, Practical Limitations, and Emerging Directions.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2026Review
- Harnessing cellular immunotherapy for cholangiocarcinoma: an integrated roadmap for overcoming resistance.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Monoclonal antibodies against claudin (CLDN) 18.2 (a component of tight junctions) in gastric epithelial cells are an emerging therapeutic option for patients with advanced gastric and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Phase 2 and 3 trials have shown clinical efficacy in patients whose tumors show high expression of CLDN18 by immunohistochemistry, and the US Food and Drug Administration has recently approved a drug for patients with advanced gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma and high CLDN18 expression. Adenocarcinoma of the bile ducts, a.k.a. cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), may share morphologic and immunophenotypic qualities with gastric adenocarcinoma, and are lethal tumors with limited therapeutic options. The purpose of this study was to determine if primary tumors of the bile ducts show expression of CLDN18 with the use of a monoclonal antibody to CLDN18, and if so, if the extent of expression is similar to that seen in the gastric and esophageal tumors of patients who responded to anti-CLDN18.2 therapeutics. Methods: Tissue microarrays containing 41 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, 36 hilar cholangiocarcinomas, and 28 distal bile duct cholangiocarcinomas were stained with a monoclonal antibody which detects CLDN18 (Ventana 43-14A). The percentage of tumor cells staining and intensity was recorded for each case with tumors with 75% of cells showing moderate to strong intensity being considered high expressers. Results: High expression was seen in 14.63% of intrahepatic, 8.3% of hilar, and 17.8% of distal bile duct cholangiocarcinomas. Overall, 13.33% of CCAs expressed CLDN18 to an extent which would qualify for treatment in the gastric and esophageal trials. Conclusions: Given the poor prognosis and current lack of therapeutic options, trials of anti-CLDN18.2 inhibitors could be considered in patients with CCA and high expression of CLDN18 by immunohistochemistry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.