Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40386614›Full record

ReviewJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2025

The potential of multi- and single-cancer blood-based early detection tests in liver cancer screening.

Won Jin Choi, Nima Nabavizadeh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Won Jin ChoiCalifornia Northstate University College of Medicine, Elk Grove, CA, USA.
Nima NabavizadehDepartment of Radiation Medicine, School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liver cancer is one of the most common causes of cancer deaths worldwide. Although fatal when diagnosed at an advanced stage, liver cancer has a favorable prognosis when identified at an earlier stage. Guidelines for liver cancer screening do exist, currently recommending the use of ultrasound with or without hematologic markers for early detection of liver cancer. However, studies have revealed shortcomings in the current state of liver cancer screenings such as underutilization stemming from lack of primary care education and logistical barriers for patients, suboptimal sensitivity of current screening methods, and lack of screening for lower risk individuals. A multitude of liquid biopsy tests that use circulating genomic analytes for early detection of cancers are currently under development and have the potential clinical implications in the early detection of liver cancer. In this overview, we highlight limitations of current liver cancer screenings and the ongoing development of multicancer early detection tests as well as cancer specific blood tests for liver cancer. As these multi-analyte blood tests hold promise in filling the gaps of current shortcomings of liver cancer screenings, it is imperative for primary care physicians, oncologists, and hepatologists involved in the screening process to be aware of ongoing studies and the further research necessary to ascertain several parameters such as the cost-benefit ratio, mortality reduction, and sensitivities of the blood tests.

Indexed as

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)liver cancer screeningmulti-analyte blood testsmulti-cancer early detection tests

Identifiers

PMID40386614
PMCPMC12078824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.