ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2025
Efficacy observation of sequential TAS-102 following regorafenib as a later-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a cohort study.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is associated with poor prognosis and limited options for later-line treatment. Regorafenib and TAS-102 have shown significant benefit and are recommended as later-line treatment for mCRC. This study aimed to investigate the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with mCRC treated with TAS-102 sequentially after regorafenib progression. Methods: This population-based cohort study retrospectively collected data of 30 patients with mCRC treated with TAS-102 sequentially after regorafenib at the Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital and the Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shanxi Medical University from January 1, 2020, to October 1, 2023. PFS and OS were considered to be the endpoints of this study. Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were used to analyze the OS, PFS, and risk factors. Results: Among the 30 patients included in the study, the median PFS (mPFS) for all patients was 3.83 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.09-5.59]. OS was divided into two categories: OS Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that the availability of sequential treatment options including regorafenib followed by TAS-102 prolongs the OS of patients compared to conventional monotherapy approaches. During the sequential treatment, regorafenib or TAS-102 combined with other therapeutic agents did not significantly differ from monotherapy, further investigation is required through large-scale trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.