ArticleArXiv2025
scDrugMap: Benchmarking Large Foundation Models for Drug Response Prediction.
Article in ArXiv, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Drug resistance remains a significant barrier to improving the effectiveness of cancer therapies. To better understand the biological mechanisms driving resistance, single-cell profiling has emerged as a powerful tool for characterizing cellular heterogeneity. Recent advancements in large-scale foundation models have demonstrated potential in enhancing single-cell analysis, yet their performance in drug response prediction remains underexplored. In this study, we developed scDrugMap, an integrated framework for drug response prediction that features both a Python command-line tool and an interactive web server. scDrugMap supports the evaluation of a wide range of foundation models, including eight single-cell foundation models and two large language models (LLMs), using large-scale single-cell datasets across diverse tissue types, cancer types, and treatment regimens. The framework incorporates a curated data resource consisting of a primary collection of 326,751 cells from 36 datasets across 23 studies, and a validation collection of 18,856 cells from 17 datasets across 6 studies. Using scDrugMap, we conducted comprehensive benchmarking under two evaluation scenarios: pooled-data evaluation and cross-data evaluation. In both settings, we implemented two model training strategies-layer freezing and fine-tuning using Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) of foundation models. In the pooled-data evaluation, scFoundation outperformed all others, while most models achieved competitive performance. Specifically, scFoundation achieved the highest mean F1 scores of 0.971 and 0.947 using layer-freezing and fine-tuning, outperforming the lowest-performing model by 54% and 57%, respectively. In the cross-data evaluation, UCE achieved the highest performance (mean F1 score: 0.774) after fine-tuning on tumor tissue, while scGPT demonstrated superior performance (mean F1 score: 0.858) in a zero-shot learning setting. Together, this study presents the first comprehensive benchmarking of large-scale foundation models for drug response prediction in single-cell data and introduces a user-friendly, flexible platform to support drug discovery and translational research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40386575PMC12083700What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.