ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Harnessing unsupervised machine learning with [
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Radiomics and artificial intelligence in precision radiotherapy for cervical cancer: a narrative review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: This study sought to develop an advanced composite model to enhance the prognostic accuracy for cervical cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). The model integrated imaging features from [ Methods: In this retrospective study, 154 patients diagnosed with primary cervical cancer and treated with CCRT were evaluated using [ Results: Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated that the two-way clustering method successfully stratified patients into distinct risk groups with significant survival differences (P<0.001), outperforming traditional K-means clustering. Predictive models constructed using meta-features derived from two-way clustering showed superior performance compared to those using principal component analysis (PCA), particularly when more than four features were included. The highest C-index values for the COX, COX_Lasso, and RSF models were observed with nine meta-features, yielding results of 0.691 ± 0.026, 0.634 ± 0.018, and 0.684 ± 0.020, respectively. In contrast, models based solely on clinical variables exhibited lower predictive performance, with C-index values of 0.645 ± 0.041, 0.567 ± 0.016, and 0.561 ± 0.033. The combination of clinical data, inflammatory markers, and radiomic features achieved the highest predictive accuracy, with a mean AUC of 0.88 ± 0.07. Conclusion: Integrating radiomic data with inflammatory markers using unsupervised two-way clustering offered a robust approach for predicting survival outcomes in cervical cancer patients. This methodology presented a promising avenue for personalized patient management, potentially leading to more informed treatment decisions and improved outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.