ArticleHealth services insights2025
Knowledge and Prevalence of Cervical Cancer Screening Among Women Receiving Prenatal Care in Accra, Ghana: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Health services insights, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The primary purpose of this study was to assess the knowledge and prevalence of cervical cancer screening (CCS) among women attending prenatal care clinics in the Okaikwei North Municipal Assembly (ONMA) in the Greater Accra region, Ghana. The study also aimed to examine whether there were differences in CCS knowledge between the women attending the prenatal care clinics. Design: This study utilized a cross-sectional, quantitative approach and a two-stage cluster sampling method. Setting: The study involved 393 women receiving prenatal care at three health facilities in the district, namely NK Salem Medical Centre Hospital (NMCH), Achimota Hospital (AH), and Lapaz Community Hospital (LCH). Primary outcome: Level of Knowledge and Prevalence of CCS. Results: The sampled participants from the three hospitals were Achimota (36.6%), Lapaz Community (32.1%), and NK Salem (31.3%). The mean age (SD) was 29.7 (±3.8) years. The age group 21 to 30 years formed the majority (57.8%). The prevalence of CCS among women receiving prenatal care was 7.4%; although most of them had heard about CCS, a proportion (46.5%) of them did not know CCS was, and only 33.9% knew Pap Smear as the test for detecting cervical cancer. A very small proportion (19.8%) of the women receiving prenatal care had CCS knowledge. There was a statistically significant difference in mean knowledge by 1.47 between women receiving prenatal care at AH and LCH, as well as by 1.82 between NMCH and LCH. Conclusion: There was a very low knowledge and prevalence of CCS in the district. Knowledge of CCS differed significantly between the health facilities in the district.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.