Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40386469›Full record

ArticleFuture healthcare journal2025

'No right time, no right place' - conversations in acute cancer care - results of a Macmillan focus group.

Lillis Ashling, Williams Hilary, Marshall Ernie, Jones Michael, Henderson Sophie, Minton Ollie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Future healthcare journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The commercial elephant in the room.Future healthcare journal · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lillis AshlingMacmillan Cancer Support, London, UK.
Williams HilaryVelindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK.
Marshall ErnieClatterbridge Cancer Centre, Liverpool, UK.
Jones MichaelMacmillan Cancer Support, London, UK.
Henderson SophieMacmillan Cancer Support, London, UK.
Minton OllieUniversity Hospitals Sussex, Brighton, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: We present work funded by Macmillan Cancer Support and hosted with the UK Acute Oncology Society from conversations about acute cancer care with oncologists, palliative care and generalist clinicians to determine how best to manage the increasing complexity of cancer patients and their management. Methods: We used a number of facilitated focus groups to draw out themes of initial management, communication differentiating between toxicity, disease progression and when and how to start conversations about the end of life. Results: There is an awareness of the significant mortality for patients needing acute cancer care. However, there is no clear responsibility to having these prognostic conversations. These include attitudes towards future care planning (FCP) in oncology, ownership and the challenges faced by non-oncologists treating more and more people living with cancer. Conclusions: There needs to be increased recognition of acute admission as a point of transition, often into end-of-life care, for people with cancer. There are significant barriers to conversations in acute cancer care, which include a lack of clear ownership in oncology pathways, and a reticence of all professionals to engage in conversations around prognosis before acute admission or at the time of acute illness. There is a need to develop standardised links between oncology and urgent care providers and for protocols within hospital to allow for access to expertise and assessment and onward sharing of information. Earlier, more transparent conversations may allow patients and families to make clearer choices about care options in the last months of life and, critically, reduce dependence on acute care.

Identifiers

PMID40386469
PMCPMC12083905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.