ArticleEndoscopic ultrasound
The comparison of clinicopathological characteristics of two distinct manifestations of gastric signet ring cell carcinoma under EUS.
Article in Endoscopic ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma: Tumor Microenvironment Reprogramming and Novel Therapeutic Targets With Emphasis on GRIN2D.Clinical and translational science · 2025Review
- Does endoscopic magnetic resonance imaging challenge EUS?Endoscopic ultrasoundArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: There are two different endoscopic ultrasonographic manifestations of gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (GSRCC). No studies have been reported on the differences in the clinical profiles of patients based on EUS examination. We aim to study the variations in clinicopathological characteristics between two distinct endoscopic ultrasonographic manifestations of GSRCC. Methods: A total of 302 patients with GSRCC confirmed by pathological examination who underwent EUS were enrolled in the study. Based on the endoscopic ultrasonographic features, patients were categorized into two groups: type 1, where the entire layer structure disappeared, and type 2, where the layer structure was still present and appeared lymphomatoid. Clinicopathologic features were collected retrospectively and analyzed. Results: Compared with type 2 patients, type 1 patients tended to develop GSRCC at an older age ( Conclusions: The two distinct endoscopic ultrasonographic manifestations of GSRCC exhibited different clinicopathological characteristics, suggesting that they may represent different subtypes of the disease that require special attention in management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.