ArticleResearch square2025
Robust inference with GhostKnockoffs in genome-wide association studies.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have been extensively adopted to depict the underlying genetic architecture of complex traits. Recent studies have demonstrated that for feature selection in GWASs data, in addition to controlling the familywise error rate (FWER), the false discovery rate (FDR) serves as an appealing alternative for detecting small effect loci associated with polygenic traits. However, the presence of correlations among genetic variants makes direct application of usual FDR-controlling procedures to marginal association tests ineffective. The knockoffs-based methods have shown guarantee in FDR control in GWASs, but their statistical validity and effectiveness in studies with related individuals remain unexplored. In this paper, we propose a knockoff-based approach by integrating recently proposed GhostKnockoffs and state-of-the-art marginal association tests. We show that GhostKnockoffs, which only requires GWAS Z-scores as input, is robust to arbitrary relatedness structure as long as the input Z-scores are derived from valid generalized linear mixed models. Therefore, it can be flexibly applied on top of the standard GWASs pipeline that accounts for relatedness to enhance the discovery of small effect loci. This robustness also generalizes GhostKnockoffs to other GWASs settings, such as the meta-analysis of multiple overlapping studies and studies based on association test statistics deviated from score tests. We demonstrate the method's performance using simulation studies and a meta-analysis of nine European ancestral genome-wide association studies and whole exome/genome sequencing studies for the Alzheimer's disease.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.