Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40386429›Full record

ArticleResearch square2025

Robust inference with GhostKnockoffs in genome-wide association studies.

Xinran Qi, Michael E Belloy, Jiaqi Gu, Xiaoxia Liu, Hua Tang, Zihuai He

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xinran QiDepartment of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA 91010, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5263-2419
Michael E BelloyDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, MO 63108, USA.
Jiaqi GuDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Xiaoxia LiuDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Hua TangDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0177-8864
Zihuai HeDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.

Funding

Stanford Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterAdmin Supp: Developing iPSC models for AD and PDP30AG066515 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Lisa Goldman Rosas · 2020 to 2026
$29.0M
Statistical and computational methods for integrative analysis of Alzheimer's Disease geneticsR01AG066206 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HE, ZIHUAI · 2019 to 2023
$3.5M
Machine Learning for Decoding the Genetic Architecture of Complex Traits and Diseases Across PopulationsR35GM127063 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Hua Tang · 2018 to 2026
$2.2M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066515NIA NIH HHS R01 AG066206NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM127063
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have been extensively adopted to depict the underlying genetic architecture of complex traits. Recent studies have demonstrated that for feature selection in GWASs data, in addition to controlling the familywise error rate (FWER), the false discovery rate (FDR) serves as an appealing alternative for detecting small effect loci associated with polygenic traits. However, the presence of correlations among genetic variants makes direct application of usual FDR-controlling procedures to marginal association tests ineffective. The knockoffs-based methods have shown guarantee in FDR control in GWASs, but their statistical validity and effectiveness in studies with related individuals remain unexplored. In this paper, we propose a knockoff-based approach by integrating recently proposed GhostKnockoffs and state-of-the-art marginal association tests. We show that GhostKnockoffs, which only requires GWAS Z-scores as input, is robust to arbitrary relatedness structure as long as the input Z-scores are derived from valid generalized linear mixed models. Therefore, it can be flexibly applied on top of the standard GWASs pipeline that accounts for relatedness to enhance the discovery of small effect loci. This robustness also generalizes GhostKnockoffs to other GWASs settings, such as the meta-analysis of multiple overlapping studies and studies based on association test statistics deviated from score tests. We demonstrate the method's performance using simulation studies and a meta-analysis of nine European ancestral genome-wide association studies and whole exome/genome sequencing studies for the Alzheimer's disease.

Identifiers

PMID40386429
PMCPMC12083671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.