ArticleResearch square2025
Development and validation of the person-centered postnatal care scale for low- and middle-income countries.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: High-quality postnatal care (PNC), including Person-centered postnatal care (PCPNC), is essential to achieving optimal maternal and neonatal outcomes. PCPNC refers to postnatal care that is respectful of and responsive to postpartum women's preferences, needs, and values. While interest in person-centered care across the reproductive health continuum has increased, there are no validated tools to comprehensively measure PCPNC. This study aims to develop and validate a tool to comprehensively measure PCPNC that is relevant to the experiences of women in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods: The adaptation and validation process included a literature review to define, construct, and develop the scale items. This was followed by expert reviews with maternal health experts, health care providers, and women with past postnatal care experience to assess content validity. We then conducted cognitive interviews with postpartum women to ensure the questions were relevant, clear, and understandable. We iteratively revised the questions at each stage and surveyed 268 postpartum women (who gave birth within the last six months) in the Upper East Region of Ghana for initial analysis. We then analyzed the data, which informed additional edits to the questions. The final questions were administered in a survey to 1,394 women in Ghana and Kenya who had received postnatal care within 12 weeks postpartum. Psychometric analysis was used for item reduction and to assess construct and criterion validity and internal consistency reliability. Results: Following iterative factor analysis, we developed a 38-item PCPNC scale. The 38 items load onto one dominant factor, with three factors having eigenvalues greater than one and Cronbach alpha of 0.93. We grouped the items into three conceptual domains representing "dignity and respect," "communication and autonomy," and "responsive and supportive care" subscales, each of which has Cronbach alpha > 0.7. PCPNC scores are associated with satisfaction with PNC and intent to receive PNC in the same health facility in the future, suggesting good criterion validity. Conclusions: The PCPNC scale is a valid and reliable tool to measure respectful and responsive PNC and will thus facilitate efforts to monitor and improve women and their baby's experiences during PNC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.