ArticleResearch square2025
Narrow Versus Broad Phenotype Definitions Affect Genetic Analysis of Language More Than Other Broad Autism Phenotype Traits.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Autism spectrum disorder is a heritable neurodevelopmental condition that displays heterogeneity in both presentation and etiology and it often presents with concomitant communication difficulties. The hypothesis behind the New Jersey Language and Autism Genetic Study is that genetic heterogeneity for component phenotypes of autism spectrum disorder may be reduced relative to the disorder as a whole. We previously published an initial phase of this study with family recruitment that used very restricted inclusion/exclusion criteria for both autism and language deficits in other family members. Here we present an expanded sample that includes a wider range of phenotypic presentations in the autism and language domains. We found that our previous findings on 15q and 16q, connecting autism spectrum disorder and oral/written communication, are only relevant to the narrow autism spectrum disorder and language impairment phenotypes (with posterior probability of linkage of 57% and 33%, respectively) though addition of families did reduce both critical regions. After variant prioritization and additional filtration based on segregation patterns and functional annotations, we determined a set of 10 and 6 top candidate risk genes with strong association to language impairment and reading impairment, respectively. The top candidate genes include both genes previously implicated in neurodevelopmental disorders (e.g.,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.