Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40386365›Full record

ArticleTranslational pediatrics2025

Protocol for the field-test and psychometric validation of the pectus excavatum evaluation questionnaire in the Dutch pectus excavatum population.

Nicky Janssen, Elise J van Polen, Jean H T Daemen, Aimée J P M Franssen, Bjorn Winkens, Karel W E Hulsewé, Yvonne L J Vissers, Erik R de Loos

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06918392 (Field-test and Psychometric Validation of the Pectus Excavatum Evaluation Questionnaire in the Dutch Pectus Excavatum Population), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06918392 recruitingnot on this map

Field-test and Psychometric Validation of the Pectus Excavatum Evaluation Questionnaire in the Dutch Pectus Excavatum Population

TypeobservationalSponsorErik de LoosRan2021 to 2026Enrolled66ConditionsPectus Excavatum
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nicky JanssenDivision of General Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9535-7824
Elise J van PolenDivision of General Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9458-4014
Jean H T DaemenDivision of General Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4878-3951
Aimée J P M FranssenDivision of General Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6399-1663
Bjorn WinkensDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6747-6228
Karel W E HulsewéDivision of General Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8131-1895
Yvonne L J VissersDivision of General Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2890-8390
Erik R de LoosDivision of General Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6313-2658

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pectus excavatum severely impacts health-related quality of life of affected individuals. The most widely used disease-specific instrument for assessing health-related quality of life in this population is the pectus excavatum evaluation questionnaire (PEEQ). As originally developed and field-tested in the United States, the PEEQ may not be directly applicable in other countries or non-English speaking populations. Here, we outline a protocol for the field-test and psychometric validation of the Dutch translation of the PEEQ. Methods: This prospective single-center study will field-test and validate the psychometric properties of the Dutch PEEQ in sixty-six pectus excavatum patients aged 12 to 17 years old who are scheduled for a Nuss procedure. Their parents/legal guardian will fill out the adult section of the questionnaire. Psychometric validation includes the evaluation of structural validity, internal consistency, test-retest validity, responsiveness, floor- and ceiling effects, and the smallest detectable change. Discussion: As a tertiary referral center, our institution attracts patients from across the Netherlands, enhancing the representativeness of the study sample. To maintain internal validity and focus on clinically significant deformities, the study excludes certain subgroups, including younger children, adults, and those treated conservatively or with the Ravitch procedure. While postoperative responsiveness is assessed, the long-term responsiveness of the PEEQ is not addressed. Despite these limitations, this study represents an important step in validating the PEEQ for clinical and research purposes. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06918392).

Indexed as

patient-centered carePatient-reported outcome measurespectus excavatumpediatric thoracic surgerythoracic surgery

Identifiers

PMID40386365
PMCPMC12079699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.