ArticleTranslational pediatrics2025
Nomogram for prediction of in-hospital mortality rate in children with congenital heart disease in pediatric intensive care: establishment and external validation.
Article in Translational pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Retrospective Epidemiological Study of Mortality in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: Trends, Causes, and Risk Factors (2014-2023).Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The incidence of congenital heart disease (CHD) has remained constant in recent years. The mortality rate is high in CHD patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), but there is limited research on risk factors for in-hospital mortality. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify risk factors for in-hospital mortality of CHD children in the ICU and develop a nomogram model to predict in-hospital mortality. Methods: Patient demographics, comorbidities, surgical history, laboratory indicators, and in-hospital mortality were extracted from the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) database. These patients were divided into training and validation cohorts in a 7:3 ratio. Variable selection was performed using single-factor Cox regression and stepwise Cox regression based on Akaike information criterion (AIC) in the training cohort. The selected variables were used to build a nomogram model, and calibration curves and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to evaluate the predictive performance of the model. Subsequently, an external validation was also carried out in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III) database. Results: A total of 2,231 patients were included in the analysis. Lymphocyte percentage [hazard ratio (HR): 1.097, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.038-1.160], magnesium ion (HR: 1.002, 95% CI: 1.001-1.002), neutrophil percentage (HR: 1.111, 95% CI: 1.050-1.175), oxygen partial pressure (pO Conclusions: Neutrophil percentage in the model exhibits the strongest predictive power, followed by lymphocyte percentage and pO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.