ReviewRSC medicinal chemistry2025
Razing the scaffolding: the elimination of non-catalytic functions of kinases through targeted protein degradation.
Review in RSC medicinal chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Expanding Synthetic Lethality in DNA Damage Response-Defective Cancers Through Stress Phenotype-Guided Kinase Targeting.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- AURORA A interacts with DICER and SETD2 to promote S-phase progression.EMBO reports · 2026Article
- Review
- Targeted protein degradation: bridging chemical biology and clinical translation.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2026Review
- Medicinal Chemistry Perspectives on Drug Repurposing: Innovative Approaches and Therapeutic Breakthrough.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2026Review
- Targeted protein degradation dismantles undruggable targets to reverse immune evasion and therapy resistance in cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Overexpression and activation of kinases often results in cancer initiation and progression through both catalytic and non-catalytic functions that promote rapid proliferation, growth, survival, and metastasis of cells. Catalytic functions are effectively blocked with the use of ATP-competitive inhibitors, however drug-resistant mutations are emerging all the time. Further, single-agent ATP-competitive inhibitors sometimes fail to eliminate oncogenic properties of the targeted kinase, likely due to (non-targeted) non-catalytic functions that are maintained. Non-catalytic functions - such as scaffolding roles, where the kinase may interact with other proteins to coordinate cellular activities or protect them from degradation by the proteasome - may be targeted through the development of protein-protein interaction (PPI) inhibitors, although this is a highly challenging endeavour. To overcome the limitations of classical (ATP-competitive) inhibitors (and circumvent the formidable feat required in the development of PPI inhibitors), which operate through "occupancy-driven" pharmacology, targeted protein degradation, as showcased by proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs), is fast becoming a highly sought-after goal for a large plethora of protein targets, and is governed by "event-driven" pharmacology. Because PROTACs result in the degradation of the protein of interest, these compounds are predicted to both catalytic and non-catalytic functions of a targeted kinase. Herein, we focus on the development of PROTACs that target (i) the scaffolding roles of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) that are associated with the formation of signaling units involved in migration and invasion events and (ii) the scaffolding roles of Aurora-A kinase (AURKA), which play a role in the protection of MYC proteins from proteasomal degradation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.