Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40386340›Full record

ArticleJPGN reports2025

Self-assessment with pediatric inflammatory bowel disease endoscopy scoring tools: A quality improvement pilot study.

Alexandra S Hudson, Ghassan Wahbeh, Dale Lee, Kendra L Francis, David Suskind, Hengqi Betty Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JPGN reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexandra S HudsonDivision of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Seattle Children's Hospital University of Washington Seattle Washington USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9016-6917
Ghassan WahbehDivision of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Seattle Children's Hospital University of Washington Seattle Washington USA.
Dale LeeDivision of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Seattle Children's Hospital University of Washington Seattle Washington USA.
Kendra L FrancisDivision of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Seattle Children's Hospital University of Washington Seattle Washington USA.
David SuskindDivision of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Seattle Children's Hospital University of Washington Seattle Washington USA.
Hengqi Betty ZhengDivision of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Seattle Children's Hospital University of Washington Seattle Washington USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0575-6475

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopy is a fundamental component pediatric gastroenterology (GI), with one of its primary applications being the evaluation and management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, there is variation in education and experience of gastroenterologists with pediatric IBD endoscopy, which can affect the quality of patient care. This quality improvement pilot study assessed familiarity and comfort with key endoscopic assessment tools (13 questions) pre- and post- an evidence-based group presentation. Both fellow and attending pediatric gastroenterologists had low levels of comfort with endoscopic Crohn's disease scoring, IBD phenotype classification, postoperative IBD scoring, and IBD dysplasia screening. The review presentation significantly enhanced their comfort, with this effect persisting for several months among fellows. To improve the quality of care for IBD patients, it would be beneficial to periodically review endoscopic guidelines in continuing medical education for pediatric gastroenterologists providing IBD care.

Indexed as

Crohn's diseasefellowulcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID40386340
PMCPMC12078052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.