ArticleJPGN reports2025
Practices of North American pediatric gastroenterologists in the management of celiac disease-A survey study.
Article in JPGN reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Celiac disease (CD) is a common autoimmune disorder characterized by an immune-mediated reaction to gluten. We conducted a survey study of the pediatric gastroenterology list server to assess the practices of North American pediatric gastroenterologists in the management of CD. Overall, 160 out of 2400 respondents participated in the study, of which 52.5% of the respondents were females and 72.5% were practicing in university hospitals. Overall, respondents were practicing in adherence to the latest guidelines, except only 36% were screening for hepatitis B virus immunization at diagnosis on most of the visits, and 25% were utilizing human leukocyte antigens typing on most visits if serologies were negative. In addition, female respondents screened for vitamin D deficiency more often than males with a
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.