Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40386308›Full record

ArticlePLOS mental health2025

Community-engaged adaptation and pilot testing of a mental health and substance use screening and referral process in HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) care in the Southern USA.

Susan Reif, Sarah M Wilson, Elena Wilson, Haley Cooper, Andy Weinhold, Amy Corneli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Susan ReifCenter for Health Policy and Inequalities Research, Duke University Global Health Institute, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1387-7202
Sarah M WilsonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Elena WilsonCenter for Health Policy and Inequalities Research, Duke University Global Health Institute, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3025-1583
Haley CooperJBS International, North Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Andy WeinholdCenter for Health Policy and Inequalities Research, Duke University Global Health Institute, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0005-5015-0896
Amy CorneliDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4629-4329

Funding

Social and Behavioral Sciences CoreP30AI064518 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Nwora Lance Okeke · 2005 to 2026
$50.5M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI064518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mental health and substance use concerns are prevalent in HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)-seeking and priority populations (e.g., same gender loving black men (SGLBM)), often negatively affecting health care outcomes. Identifying individuals who could benefit from access to effective behavioral health treatment remains suboptimal among these populations. We utilized a community-informed process to adapt an evidence-based behavioral health identification and linkage model, Screening Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT), to include mental health screening and increase cultural responsiveness for use in PrEP care. We piloted the adapted SBIRT model (SBIRT PrEP) in a PrEP clinic in the U.S. South that serves primarily SGLBM. A total of 29 SGLBM participated in the pilot, which involved answering screening questions about anxiety, depression, alcohol, and drug use on an iPad. Participants met with a PrEP navigator to review screening results using a guided model that incorporated participant self-determination and motivational interviewing techniques. SGLBM and staff completed surveys and qualitative interviews that assessed their perceptions of the program. Study findings indicated that the adapted SBIRT PrEP model was acceptable and valued by clinic clients and staff. Survey and interview responses indicated that most clients believed that: 1) substance use and mental health screening was appropriate and important to include in PrEP services; 2) the program was an effective way to address mental health and substance use concerns; and 3) the duration of the screening process was acceptable. A majority of clients reported feeling comfortable answering behavior health screening questions on the iPad and discussing the results with the PrEP navigator. A larger, more rigorous trial is needed to further test the SBIRT PrEP model. Identifying methods to better address behavioral health concerns is critical to enhance PrEP participation and improve quality of life for individuals receiving PrEP.

Identifiers

PMID40386308
PMCPMC12083854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.