ArticleFood chemistry: X2025
Strategy to improve the confidence level of qualitative screening by high resolution mass spectrometry: A case study of mycotoxins in maize.
Article in Food chemistry: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Suspected and Non-Targeted Screening of Non-Edible Substances in Food by UPLC-Q-TOF-MS.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Targeted, suspect and non-targeted screening by high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) is developing rapidly. In this study, a qualitative screening method was established using HPLC-HRMS on data dependent acquisition for the analysis of mycotoxins in maize. To ensure the sensitivity and applicability of the method, 41 mycotoxin standards were applied for method optimization. A quantitative structure-retention relationships (QSRR) model was developed for retention time prediction and projection using machine learning, providing supplementary evidence for molecule annotation. The predicted errors were all below 0.5 min, contributing to improve the confidence level of suspect and non-targeted screening for mycotoxins. Thresholds affecting the accuracy of screening results were also investigated systematically. Performance metrics including Accuracy, F1 score, Matthew's correlation coefficient (MCC) were introduced to evaluate the qualitative screening method. The developed method was applied in the qualitative screening of collected maize samples, where 11 mycotoxins were screened at high confidence level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.