Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40386280›Full record

ArticleTranslational cancer research2025

Development and validation of survival prediction nomograms for patients with early-stage rectal cancer: a population-based study.

Sirui Zhu, Yuncan Xing, Jiawei Tu, Wei Pei, Jianjun Bi, Zhaoxu Zheng, Qiang Feng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sirui Zhu *Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yuncan Xing *Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jiawei Tu *Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Wei PeiDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jianjun BiDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Zhaoxu ZhengDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Qiang FengDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) has been rising in recent years, with a concurrent increase in early-stage rectal cancer (ESRC) cases. This study aimed to investigate risk factors and developed nomograms to predict overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in ESRC patients in order to improve clinical outcomes across diverse patient subgroups. Methods: Risk factors were investigated in ESRC patients by analyzing data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We developed and validated nomograms to predict OS and CSS after dividing patients into two risk groups. Then we assessed the potential benefits of various therapies across subgroups after propensity score-matching (PSM). Results: T stage, tumor grade, age, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, tumor size, and surgical options emerged as independent risk factors through univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, contributing to the OS nomogram; while for CSS, the identified risk factors were tumor grade, age, elevated CEA levels and surgical options. The Concordance-index of the nomogram surpassed that of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 7 Conclusions: This study presents a comprehensive prognostic analysis of patients with ESRC and developed predictive nomograms for OS and CSS. Subgroup analyses highlight the potential benefits of local resection in younger patients with low risk.

Indexed as

chemotherapyEarly-stage rectal cancer (ESRC)local resectionprognosisradiation

Identifiers

PMID40386280
PMCPMC12079600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.