ArticleJournal of food science and technology2025
Gluten identification from food images using advanced deep learning and transfer learning methods.
Article in Journal of food science and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Food image recognition has become an essential application in computer vision, with significant implications for dietary management, particularly for individuals with specific dietary restrictions. This paper shows a novel approach for gluten image classification, designed to assist individuals with celiac disease in identifying gluten-containing foods. Our proposed model leverages a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architecture, specifically utilizing a EfficientNet pretrained model, to accurately identify and classify food images. In the proposed model We utilized a curated dataset from the Food101 dataset, selecting 20,000 images focused on common food recipes. We used the EfficientNet pretrained model, achieving a training accuracy of 99.02% and a validation accuracy of 98.38%. The model was further evaluated on 2000 test images, obtaining an accuracy of 99%. The data was meticulously labelled to ensure high-quality training as well as testing processes. Our results demonstrate the model's effectiveness in gluten classification, highlighting its potential utility for celiac patients. This work contributes to the growing field of food image recognition and offers a valuable tool for dietary management in celiac patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.