ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Developing a suicide risk prediction model for hospitalized adolescents with depression in China.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Estimating the Risk of Suicide Tendencies Among Chinese Middle School Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.Psychology research and behavior management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Adolescent suicide risk, particularly among individuals with depression, is a growing public health concern in China, driven by increasing social pressures and evolving family dynamics. However, limited research has focused on suicide prediction models tailored for hospitalized Chinese adolescents with depression. This study aims to develop a suicide risk prediction model for early identification of high-risk individuals using internal validation, providing insights for future clinical applications. Methods: The study involved 229 adolescents aged 13-18 diagnosed with depression, admitted to a hospital in Shanxi, China. Feature selection was performed using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (Lasso) regression, and key predictors were incorporated into a multivariate logistic regression model. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), Hosmer-Lemeshow test, calibration curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), and clinical impact curves (CIC). Results: The model demonstrated AUC values of 0.839 (95% CI: 0.777, 0.899) for the training set and 0.723 (95% CI: 0.601, 0.845) for the testing set, indicating strong discrimination capability. Significant predictors included gender, social frequency, parental relationships, self-harm behavior, experiences of loss, and sleep duration. DCA and CIC supported the model's predictive potential. Conclusion: The model demonstrated strong predictive performance in internal validation, suggesting potential value for suicide risk assessment in hospitalized adolescents with depression. However, its generalizability remains to be confirmed. Further external validation in larger, multi-center cohorts is required to assess its robustness and clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.