ArticleDigital health
Developing and validating an accelerated online Canadian training in data science for the health sciences community.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: With the rise of digital health, proficiency in data science is becoming increasingly important. University curricula often lack adequate data analysis and programming education, hence the need to develop an accessible training platform. Methods: A free, accelerated R programming course was developed for healthcare trainees with no prior programming experience. The first module was composed of seven video capsules over 10 days to teach foundational R programming for clinical research. A pretest and posttest study assessed participants' skills pretraining, immediately posttraining, and three months later. Participants (students, researchers, professors) were recruited from Montreal's academic healthcare community. A Real-Time Delphi method guided test development and mixed-effects models compared scores. Results: Of 102 enrolled participants, 100 were analyzed, which were mostly aged 20-30 (72%) and medical students (92%, 69.6%). Of them, 84% successfully completed the course within 10 days (95% CI [77%-91%]). Mean test scores increased from 4.5/10 pretest (95% CI [4.1-4.8]) to 8.4/10 posttraining (95% CI [8.1-8.7]) ( Conclusion: This accelerated R programming course effectively improves data science skills in healthcare trainees with no prior knowledge. It addresses key gaps in formal data science education with the potential to enhance independent research and analysis skills in complement to university curricula.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.